https://publish.thescienceinsight.com/index.php/msbd/issue/feedManagement Science and Business Decisions2025-12-28T00:00:00+00:00Iqra Javedmanager@thescienceinsight.comOpen Journal Systems<div id="bannerR"> <h2>Why to publish in MSBD?</h2> <p><em>Management Science and Business Decisions</em> (ISSN 2767-6528; eISSN 2767-3316) is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of Analytical Decision Sciences and Operations Research. The journal provides a rigorous platform for research that utilizes mathematical, statistical, and systematic modeling to solve complex managerial and organizational challenges. Non-parametric techniques are of particular interest. MSBD is an open access double-blind peer-reviewed journal that is published by <a href="https://thescienceinsight.com/">Science Insight</a> (USA) bi-annually. </p> </div>https://publish.thescienceinsight.com/index.php/msbd/article/view/111Evaluating Generative AI Initiatives in Human Resources: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis2025-12-26T07:35:19+00:00Dewi Shintadewiishintaa@gmail.comKhalil Nasir Khankhalilnasir9161@gmail.comMuhammad Nadeemnadeem16501@gmail.com<p>The current study introduces a systematic framework to address the critical challenge of prioritizing Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) initiatives within Human Resources (HR) Management. Confronted with multiple high-potential yet resource-intensive options, HR leaders require an objective method for strategic investment. The study employs a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methodology, integrating the Analytical Ordinal Priority Approach (AOPA) and the Dynamic Grey Relational Analysis (DGRA). Ten distinct GenAI use cases are identified and evaluated against eleven strategic criteria—spanning impact, feasibility, risk, and organizational momentum—based on the judgments of a diverse panel of experts from HR, Information Technology, Finance, Legal, and Operations. The results yield a validated, consolidated ranking of initiatives. The Employee Sentiment & Trend Analyzer emerges as the highest-priority initiative, followed by the Intelligent HR Helpdesk Chatbot and the Automated Recruitment Coordinator, while the Interactive Leadership Training Simulator is consistently ranked lowest. The study provides HR leaders with a transparent, data-driven framework for phased implementation, advocating for initial investments in initiatives that balance strategic value, strong return on investment, and manageable risk to build organizational confidence and momentum in the adoption of transformative AI technologies.</p> <p> </p>2025-12-28T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Science Insighthttps://publish.thescienceinsight.com/index.php/msbd/article/view/118Factors Influencing the Adoption of AI-Enhanced Enterprise Resource Planning in Logistics2025-11-05T14:09:29+00:00Beenish Ramzanbeenishnawaz033@gmail.com<p>This study aims to evaluate and prioritize the critical factors influencing the adoption of AI-enhanced Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems within China’s logistics sector. A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology is employed, integrating the Dynamic Grey Relational Analysis (DGRA) and the Analytical Ordinal Priority Approach (AOPA). Data were collected from 223 logistics professionals via a structured questionnaire, and the factors were ranked based on their distance to an ideal reference and their ordinally derived importance weights. We found Data Security & Privacy to be the most critical factor based on both models. We also found the strong convergence between DGRA and AOPA results confirms the robustness of the ranking. This study provides the first empirically validated, multi-model approach specifically designed to prioritize AI-enhanced ERP factors for the logistics industry.</p> <p> </p>2025-12-28T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Science Insight